

It is said that the Religious Right began it's career in politics with Reagan in the early eighties. Thirty years later, American has seen the crest of its wave peak and is watching the movement, which once was such a dominating force, retreat from the superstitious nether-world from whence it came. The world has watched in awe as the last world superpower has been romanced by unreason and myths all the while watching its standing in the world falter on top it's house of cards.
How can the Republican party recover, when it's base disappears with the progress of education and critical thinking? This progress of reason has a tradition of steadfast boldness in the face of insistence on magical thinking. The only thing we have to do, is to uphold our history and in time the false idols will crumble.
This article explains how Frank Schaeffer, an author and promoter of the Religious Right's dominance in American politics, had a change of heart and now sees clearly the damage it has caused.
My doubts really began when I realized that the people we were working with on the Religious Right were profoundly anti-American," Schaeffer said in a recent interview. "I began to get the same vibe from them I got from my friends on the far left during the Vietnam War. They seemed to be rooting for North Vietnam. When I was working with the Religious Right, they seemed be rooting for the failure of America. Bad news was good news for them.
Source

|
Lycas7xPosted 03.16.08 I'm not predjudice, I own a black cat. I don't actually think some pussy is going to get elected. We are looking at eight more years of Reganonmics. With all these baby boomers retiring and monopolizing the health care industry, Its obvious none of them voted, or they are no longer liberals. I think it was just a convient thing people do when their young. |
|
AlexanderPosted 03.14.08 Apparently, "laborious silliness" = "foolishness" |
|
timmyblogPosted 03.14.08 I don't have time to read your long laborious silliness Mr. "born-againer" pants. Instead I have decided to post a short story by Earnest Hemmingway who would have translated a way cooler bible than Shakespeare did. |
|
ScottadgesPosted 03.14.08 There's this passage I got memorized... |
|
|
wharf rat to be surePosted 03.13.08 but anyone who could act such as those of the religious right, and not be using such boldness as a guise for true self conscience existentialism, would most certainty be of no use to human existence anyway. there a difference between believing and deceiving, and all the religious right serve to do is deceive. they distract from true knowledge of self by diluting peoples thoughts with fear and admiration of a thought that may or may not have occurred to a human so far devolved by today. the knowledge possessed by those that created the basis for the religious right today is absolutely pathetic if you really think about it. and based on their writings we now have a business that disguises itself as a imaginary cross to be bared from life to even after death? Gaia, is what i know to be a constant. to believe that something so great and true could be created by anything greater in a blink of 7 days would undermine the existence of humans as we know ourselves to be. i love you all. its all a means to an end. love. |
|
BeelzebubbyPosted 03.13.08 Well as long as we are talking about great works of fiction, I have a quote from The Lord of the Rings. |
|
AlexanderPosted 03.13.08 OK...you guys are good! I am going to post more of 1 Corinthians, chapter 1, starting with verse 17. I usually do not Bible thump...but this IS a great discussion and I wanted to try to put a little more perspective on it. Here goes: |
|
timmyblogPosted 03.13.08 pwned^2 |
|
timmyblogPosted 03.13.08 The ambiguity and confusion that can be interpreted from the bible only further reinforces the hypocrisy that comes fourth from its passages. |
|
ScottadgesPosted 03.13.08 I'm confused by this... |
|
AlexanderPosted 03.13.08 Here's a quick one...there is no way that George W. Bush should have been president. A former drinker/user, not a great speaker, Al Gore was better looking (women say) and a better speaker, and so on. Yet, he is the president of the U.S. He has been called "foolish" and worse more than any other president in U.S. history...yet, he is the president of the U.S. |
|
JBPosted 03.13.08 Alexander, i am confused by the passage you cited earlier. Can you give me an example (outside of quoting the bible) of how "God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty..." and why this was important to God? |
|
DekkerPosted 03.13.08 The definition of foolish is: lacking in sense, judgment, or discretion |
|
AlexanderPosted 03.13.08 Guys...guys...guys... |
|
timmyblogPosted 03.12.08 pwned. |
|
timmyblogPosted 03.12.08 The religious right is the base that George W. Bush manipulated to get elected. He doesn't even follow what most "conservative born-againers" do. He swears, and conveniently practiced religion around a time when he decided he wanted to run for President. |
|
JamesPosted 03.12.08 What truth? The Religious Right has the truth? According to what? |
|
AlexanderPosted 03.12.08 Who are the "religious right"? Bad news is not good news for myself as a mostly conservative born-againer. It is merely an indication that evil exists and is not something to be denied..not glorified or simply ignored. My best answer to this "religious right" thing is to first say truth can sometimes appears arrogant. However, arrogance for knowing the truth is wrong as well. Before flogging the "religious right," consider this: |

Advertise with us
