Tuesday, March 11, 2008

The End Of The Religious Right

The End Of The Religious Right

Ethan Cooper

It is said that the Religious Right began it's career in politics with Reagan in the early eighties. Thirty years later, American has seen the crest of its wave peak and is watching the movement, which once was such a dominating force, retreat from the superstitious nether-world from whence it came. The world has watched in awe as the last world superpower has been romanced by unreason and myths all the while watching its standing in the world falter on top it's house of cards.

How can the Republican party recover, when it's base disappears with the progress of education and critical thinking? This progress of reason has a tradition of steadfast boldness in the face of insistence on magical thinking. The only thing we have to do, is to uphold our history and in time the false idols will crumble.

This article explains how Frank Schaeffer, an author and promoter of the Religious Right's dominance in American politics, had a change of heart and now sees clearly the damage it has caused.

My doubts really began when I realized that the people we were working with on the Religious Right were profoundly anti-American," Schaeffer said in a recent interview. "I began to get the same vibe from them I got from my friends on the far left during the Vietnam War. They seemed to be rooting for North Vietnam. When I was working with the Religious Right, they seemed be rooting for the failure of America. Bad news was good news for them.

Source

Share this Story

18 Comments

Lycas7x

Posted 03.16.08

I'm not predjudice, I own a black cat. I don't actually think some pussy is going to get elected. We are looking at eight more years of Reganonmics. With all these baby boomers retiring and monopolizing the health care industry, Its obvious none of them voted, or they are no longer liberals. I think it was just a convient thing people do when their young.

I think all anybody wants is socialized medicine and job security with structural unemployment so prevalent. Who is really all that liberal? We need to be environmentally conscentious. I think the word should be sensible.

Another glorious day in the empire... What is it we are trying to protect? They have taken everything away including our rights and building prisions. There are jobs in the service industry. Look at the distribution of good and services, and the devalue of the dollar.... and the war is going to continue.

We wont have any resourse to fight the terrorist anyhow, and the war on drugs... they want to out-sourse all of us.
The religious right are just scapegoats. I cant stand it when they throw them a bone. Nothing is going to change. Its all media hype.


Alexander

Posted 03.14.08

Apparently, "laborious silliness" = "foolishness"

...to some!


timmyblog

Posted 03.14.08

I don't have time to read your long laborious silliness Mr. "born-againer" pants. Instead I have decided to post a short story by Earnest Hemmingway who would have translated a way cooler bible than Shakespeare did.

"For sale: baby shoes, never worn."

You see! Look my story was way more interesting and it was only 6 words! And, it was sprinkled with way less bullshit than any corinthians passage.


Scottadges

Posted 03.14.08

There's this passage I got memorized...

1 Cornithians 1:27... "The path of the foolish man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of wise men. Blessed is he who, in the name of magical thinking, shepherds the fool through the valley of the education and critical thinking. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is The Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

...I been sayin' that shit for years. And if you heard it, that meant your ass...

I never gave much thought to what it meant - I just thought it was some cold-blooded shit to say to a motherfucker before I popped a cap in his ass. But I saw some shit this mornin' made me think twice.

See, now I'm thinkin': Maybe it means you're the wise man, and I'm the foolish man. And Mr. 9mm here... he's the shepherd protecting my foolish ass in the valley of enlightenment.

Or, it could mean YOU'RE the foolish man and I'M the shepherd and it's the WORLD that's intelligent and rational. I'd like that... But that shit ain't the truth...

The truth is YOU'RE the fool. And I'M the tyranny of wise men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd...


wharf rat to be sure

Posted 03.13.08

but anyone who could act such as those of the religious right, and not be using such boldness as a guise for true self conscience existentialism, would most certainty be of no use to human existence anyway. there a difference between believing and deceiving, and all the religious right serve to do is deceive. they distract from true knowledge of self by diluting peoples thoughts with fear and admiration of a thought that may or may not have occurred to a human so far devolved by today. the knowledge possessed by those that created the basis for the religious right today is absolutely pathetic if you really think about it. and based on their writings we now have a business that disguises itself as a imaginary cross to be bared from life to even after death? Gaia, is what i know to be a constant. to believe that something so great and true could be created by anything greater in a blink of 7 days would undermine the existence of humans as we know ourselves to be. i love you all. its all a means to an end. love.


Beelzebubby

Posted 03.13.08

Well as long as we are talking about great works of fiction, I have a quote from The Lord of the Rings.

From The Shadow of the Past:
"Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. I have not much hope that Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it. And he is bound up with the fate of the Ring. My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end; and when that comes, the pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many—yours not least." -Gandalf


Alexander

Posted 03.13.08

OK...you guys are good! I am going to post more of 1 Corinthians, chapter 1, starting with verse 17. I usually do not Bible thump...but this IS a great discussion and I wanted to try to put a little more perspective on it. Here goes:

17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel--not with words of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power. 18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate." 20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. 22 Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24 but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength. 26 Brothers, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. 28 He chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things--and the things that are not--to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him. 30 It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God--that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. 31 Therefore, as it is written: "Let him who boasts boast in the Lord."


timmyblog

Posted 03.13.08

pwned^2


timmyblog

Posted 03.13.08

The ambiguity and confusion that can be interpreted from the bible only further reinforces the hypocrisy that comes fourth from its passages.

That being said let's just play this stupid game where I just say, what is, or challenge your facts based on my own large words and confusing writing skills.

What is facts anyway? Aren't they just opinions of the masses, god created facts, and opinions, and masses, to confuse us. And he created confusion to confuse us.

Try and digest that you intellectual snobs.


Scottadges

Posted 03.13.08

I'm confused by this...

++++++

"...sometimes the 'foolish' can be wise."

and then:

" God uses the foolish to befuddle the 'wise.' "

++++++

If the "foolish" can be wise, how can God use the "wise" to befuddle the wise...

Wouldn't that make the wise 'foolish'? And if the wise are foolish, were they ever wise in the first place to be befuddled so wisely??


Alexander

Posted 03.13.08

Here's a quick one...there is no way that George W. Bush should have been president. A former drinker/user, not a great speaker, Al Gore was better looking (women say) and a better speaker, and so on. Yet, he is the president of the U.S. He has been called "foolish" and worse more than any other president in U.S. history...yet, he is the president of the U.S.

So you can connect the dots. This is just a quick note. I may have to do a little research to give some other examples. But to me it is quite evident that God uses the foolish to befuddle the "wise."


JB

Posted 03.13.08

Alexander, i am confused by the passage you cited earlier. Can you give me an example (outside of quoting the bible) of how "God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty..." and why this was important to God?


Dekker

Posted 03.13.08

The definition of foolish is: lacking in sense, judgment, or discretion

The antonym of foolish is: judicious, prudent, sage, sane, sapient, sensible, sound, wise


Alexander

Posted 03.13.08

Guys...guys...guys...

"swearing" means you are not a Christian?

"religious right is foolish" Correct! Now, here's a review...who does God use?

I never said the religious right has the truth...but, again, I am not defending any labeled group...just the fact that there is right and wrong. There is truth and untruth...and that the "foolish" can be wise! :)


timmyblog

Posted 03.12.08

pwned.


timmyblog

Posted 03.12.08

The religious right is the base that George W. Bush manipulated to get elected. He doesn't even follow what most "conservative born-againers" do. He swears, and conveniently practiced religion around a time when he decided he wanted to run for President.

The conservative born-againers are responsible for being blindly led by "truth" that they get from a bible that was translated by hundreds and hundreds of times and claims that not only the world is only 6,000 years old, but that we're all going to be violently judged someday for our sins. Yea ok, and monkeys will fly out of my butt.

The religious right is foolish, and religion doesn't belong anywhere near politics because ignorant followers of the bible believe that man actually lived with dinosaurs, and that evolution is complete hogwash.

The only reason the religious right will never be "out" is because they're good at exploiting the ignorant and ill-informed. After all, look at who elected George Bush:

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/US-Election-IQ2004.htm


James

Posted 03.12.08

What truth? The Religious Right has the truth? According to what?


Alexander

Posted 03.12.08

Who are the "religious right"? Bad news is not good news for myself as a mostly conservative born-againer. It is merely an indication that evil exists and is not something to be denied..not glorified or simply ignored. My best answer to this "religious right" thing is to first say truth can sometimes appears arrogant. However, arrogance for knowing the truth is wrong as well. Before flogging the "religious right," consider this:

"God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty..." 1 Cornithians 1:27

You see, the "religious right" can appear so foolish, but don't count everything they say out...or write that it is "the end" for them.

Post a Comment or Bookmark this Story